Over on the excellent Action on Rights for Children's (ARCH) website is a overview on the use of 'Biometrics in Schools' for the past 10 years in the UK.
A snippet from the report details the lengths biometric vendors are going to, to market biometric technologies specifically at teachers and parents:
"Some companies have engaged PR firms in order to promote their systems. Livewire PR, for example, were engaged by ‘Vericool’ to provide ‘crisis management’ for its registration system and describes its tactics as follows:
* Ensured that all news releases included implementation advice from the Department for Children Schools and Families (DCSF) – a guideline developed in association with VeriCool - [Interesting to know the DCSF was working with the commercial biometric industry to develope guidelines, presumably separate to the guidance issued by BECTA. Was this ethical given that evidence suggests the DCSF failed to take advice from elsewhere?]
* Used ‘superfan schools’ to highlight the positive benefits of biometrics in education.
* Secured coverage on new school installations within the local media in a drive to educate parents about biometrics and dispel any myths surrounding fingertip technology.
* Commenced executive profiling programme for VeriCool spokespeople to educate teachers and parents about the benefits of biometrics."